MENTAL HEALTH - MOVE AWAY FROM TOXIC PEOPLE

Akua J.Quao

We can all experience some tension and difficulty in any relationship. We may hit a painful rock with loved ones, work colleagues or our flatmate, but that is an expected part of the development process in human relationships.  More importantly is the willingness and ability to overcome these hurdles.  But there are some relationships that we need to evaluate very closely.  These are the interactions where we continually feel that we are in the presence of a person that can leave us feeling drained, anxious, depressed, and even questioning the purpose of our very existence.

The red flags

No matter how much you try to work it out in your mind and maybe make excuses for that person, the truth remains that, whenever you are with that person, something just doesn’t feel right.  You feel uncomfortable, perhaps fearful, clammy, or extremely tense to the point of getting heart palpitations. It may be that, upon first encounters, you seemed to get on well, there appeared to be mutual respect, but then something changed significantly. Perhaps they began to give you haughty looks, make the occasional condescending remark about you, isolate you from others, or prevent you from fully expressing yourself?  There is a tendency to project everything that is wrong onto you, by constantly blaming you. This pattern keeps continuing and intensifies to the extent that you almost know what to pre-empt. 

You, however, keep comforting yourself with the belief that, with time, things will get better. The truth is that a year or more may have gone by already and nothing positive about that person has changed. To you they have grown wings and are now nastier.  The focus of the narcissistic person is always on themselves; it’s never about acknowledging the person they are hurting. If you remain the victim, they are content.

unsplash-image-rYteFvqUGVw.jpg

Important facts

The first hurdle is to admit that you are in a toxic relationship. Ironically, toxic relationships don’t have a clear definition amongst professionals, but there is consensus around characteristics such as bullying, power imbalance, and intense emotions such as shame, guilt, and lack of empathy.

Researchers have found that these types of relationships cause damage to both physical and mental health, families, staff morale, workplace motivation and performance, and much more untold damage. It is negative behaviour that affects all ages and people in every part of the world.  So why is it that this bad behaviour can fester?

Many people are sadly caught unaware. The behaviour is often subtle to begin with, the person was simply being nice or helpful. This can happen in a toxic workplace with bosses and colleagues, or in a toxic family between spouses, parents, and children. Increasingly this is also manifesting itself online with young people in particular becoming victims.

Protect yourself.

Once you have accepted that you are involved in a toxic relationship, it is important to seek help to prevent the situation from escalating. Reaching out to experienced people who can help you navigate out of a traumatic situation is crucial to your recovery.

But who do you really know that you can confide in and trust?

You can contact organisations such as the Samaritans or Childline for a non-judgemental listening ear. Confidential workplace counselling can help support issues in the workplace, whilst Refuge and organisations such as Women and Girls Network will provide a comprehensive range of support for more domestic issues.

Often it takes therapeutic intervention working with you closely to steadily resolve difficult internalised issues.  The long-term benefit of such an intervention is to help you overcome any unresolved relationship traumas and break unhealthy cycles. Because of the pain attached to such relationships, it’s also easy to contemplate revenge where it isn’t necessary. Most importantly, seek a long-term solution that will enable you to see your situation for what it ultimately is; one dark chapter that needs to end for good for you to embrace the new.


Samaritans

Women and Girls Network

unsplash-image-vXymirxr5ac.jpg

Mental Health Foundation

.


KHAN HOT UNDER THE COLLAR

By Selina Seesunkur

Whilst Sadiq Khan won a second term as Mayor, it was not an easy fight. In the first round, no one candidate secured 50 per cent of the vote at first preference. Very few imagined that Shaun Bailey AM would do as well as he did, but Shaun ran a clean fight based on his own personal experience of growing up in hardship in London, enabling him to increase the Conservative vote share by 1.5%. This meant the Conservatives were able to obtain an extra seat on the Assembly.

Pollsters predicted Khan would win more than half of the first-round votes, but he failed to reach his record-setting vote total of 2016, winning with a 228,000-vote majority. Voter turnout was 42%, a drop of 4% from 2016. Despite having a vey high number of candidates it certainly was a two-horse race with Sadiq Khan obtaining 1,013,721 of the first preference votes and Shaun Bailey 893,051. But the gap widened when the count went to the second preference votes, with Shaun Bailey achieving 26,3812 and Sadiq Khan 40,0478. Labour now holds 11 seats, whilst the Conservatives hold 9, Green Party 3 and Liberal Democrats 2. A record number of ballot papers were rejected as the new style pro-forma caused much confusion with voters, resulting in 114,201 rejected. Could this have made all the difference?

Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

 

In his speech Shaun said he had been written off “by pollsters, by journalists, by fellow politicians. But it’s no surprise to me that Londoners didn’t write me off.” Shaun promised to tackle crime by recruiting 8000 more police officers, he said he would reverse the ULEZ, and would deliver 100,000 shared ownership homes that would be sold at £100,000 each, whilst Khan has a track record of failing to deliver on crime, housing and the environment.

A WAR OF WHEELS

By Hattie Turner

Why sticking to your lane won't solve the conflict between cyclists and drivers.

The phrase ‘before you judge someone, walk a mile in their shoes’ has never been more true when considering the conflict between cyclists and motorists. Switch ‘walk’ for ‘cycle’ and I guarantee you’ll find a lot of drivers are more sympathetic to the danger cyclists face on a daily basis; unobservant pedestrians, chaotic commuters and a general lack of use of the indicator. Likewise, a cyclist who spends a day working in a vehicle may find their sympathy increases somewhat, after they are stuck driving round one-way streets and avoiding roadworks, while earning what is often a modest income. Cyclists are not the bad guys, but nor are drivers. Why is it so hard for a lot of people to see this? With just hours to go until the London mayoral election, I want to explore one of the longstanding issues the city has been plagued by. 

Cyclists are labelled as a ‘nuisance’, ‘entitled’ and ‘self righteous’ and motorists are ‘aggressive’ and ‘inconsiderate’. This language is unhelpful at best, and downright tribal at worst. Last week I saw a post by a cyclist boasting about going through a red light while being tailed by the police. It’s this very attitude that isn’t helping. In the same week I witnessed a motorist, red with rage shouting expletives at a cyclist who was barely coping with the demands of Hyde Park roundabout. On the face of it, these two groups are sworn enemies, but is there any room for conciliation?  

unsplash-image-Sz1aoOyeIFE.jpg

Data from earlier this year shows cycling has increased by more than 35% in London. Once traffic goes back to normal levels will the ‘35%’ find they are met with hostility from other returning road users? According to TFL nearly two-thirds of the traffic on the city’s roads are buses, taxis, tradespeople and delivery drivers. These are driven by people who have largely been working throughout the pandemic, delivering our parcels and getting us where we needed to be this last year. Similarly, the boom in takeaways and online shopping has meant there are more and more key worker cyclists on London’s roads. Speaking with XeroE, an eco-courier start-up, they calculated their fleet of cyclists has quadrupled in the last year.  

The crux of the mutual resentment is that there’s an element of danger when bicycles and motorists co-exist on the same piece of tarmac. London’s population is projected to rise to 10 million by 2030, potentially exacerbating this conflict Yet, there is real optimism that technological developments for road users will help mitigate deaths, which in turn, will alleviate road user tension. The LINKS Foundation has developed a global navigation device fitted with a 5G transceiver used to convey location information to nearby cars. Companies like the LINKS Foundation are building into the new ‘smart city concept’ where all traffic and infrastructure are interconnected and constantly communicating information designed to keep all road users safe. Cyclists and other road users will no longer be in each other's way, but harmoniously weaving in and out of each other like a synchronised swimming team. 

As with most tensions in society, there is not one group who is all bad, nor one group who is all good. Until we understand that most of us are just trying to go about our daily business, to meet the demands of working in a city and just trying to enjoy the ride, this divide will remain.

Hattie Turner

Hattie Turner