BRITAIN ON THE BRINK?

By Callum Brunton

Will Scotland leave the UK?

It’s the question I was asking myself almost 7 years ago when I cast my vote in the Scottish independence referendum at age 16.

It’s the question I thought I knew the answer to in the early hours of Friday 19 September 2014.

But the truth is, it’s an impossible question to answer.

In the years leading up to the referendum, independence dominated Scotland’s televised media, radio stations and newspapers to make it the most extensively covered political event in Scottish history. Millions of people were having conversations in classrooms, offices, supermarkets and pubs about what Scotland’s future should be and who we are as a nation. Over that 2 year long debate I had my fair share of shouting matches over the dining room table with my dad on the pros and cons of whether to remain part of the United Kingdom or become independent. 

The referendum had record high voter engagement, with the largest turnout for an election in the UK since before the introduction of universal suffrage.

Seven years on, independence continues to define Scotland’s electoral politics and mass media reporting. Public opinion polling from January 2021 has suggested that up to 60% of Scots would consider voting in favour of independence in the event of a second referendum and this has become the fuel to many sensationalist tabloid articles and widespread media speculation.

But are we close to seeing Scotland become independent? 

Nicola Sturgeon’s approval rating has certainly gained momentum since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic. But with investigations into her role in the Alex Salmond court case ongoing, and increasing traction for opposition leaders, can her popularity hold?

Brexit brings a different dynamic to the independence question. Scotland now faces life outside of the EU despite having voted 62% to remain. According to Professor John Curtice and Ian Montagu, this has contributed to a rise in support for independence.  That said, in the years following the referendum on Brexit, support for the SNP and independence dipped to its lowest level in years. As the split from Europe now becomes embedded, it remains uncertain how this might affect a future ballot on independence. 

Then consider the polls, which have become the cornerstone for setting the narrative on Scotland’s future. 

At the time of writing this, polling would suggest that more people in Scotland want to leave the UK than remain. But dig deeper, and the picture becomes murkier. The polls also suggest that most Scottish people believe independence distracts from other issues and that the Scottish government should focus on the pandemic, education, and the health service ahead of independence.

People live in the here and now, and this is reflected in public opinion polls. When asked to consider what currency an independent Scotland would use, and the arrangement at the Scotland-England border, polling from Survation has suggested that most people in Scotland would still reject independence by a similar margin to the previous referendum. In the lead-up to the 2014 referendum, the polls were also inaccurate by a factor of more than 3%. This margin of error makes it all-the-more difficult to predict ballot outcomes on this question, especially if public opinion remains as divided as it currently stands. 

It’s worth remembering that Scotland is the most politically volatile country in the UK. Since the referendum in 2014, 90% of Westminster constituencies in Scotland have changed to a different political party, and the vote share for Scotland's largest parties has bounced by over 20% between different elections. 

And let’s not forget about the impact of underlying factors such as religion, social class and national identity, or the economic and social aftermath of the pandemic.

Ultimately, Scotland’s future relationship to the rest of the UK will come down to the individual choices made by the people of this country. For some, Brexit will be the be-all and end-all in deciding what their attitude is towards the constitution. For others, it might come down to the economy, or to party leaders, or to which campaign has the better logo. 

Nobody knows how attitudes in Scotland might change if we return our focus to another 2 year long independence debate. But maybe we should ask ourselves why speculators in the media are so determined to make a ruling now on what the Scottish public thinks when no vote has been cast on the issue since 2014.

REIGNITING FAITH IN LOCAL DEMOCRACY

CitizenLab is expanding its presence in the UK market in a bid to revive faith in democracy and drive up participation in local decision making. With an already well-established presence in mainland Europe, CitizenLab’s civic engagement technology is set to be embraced by local authorities and organisations across the UK following a series of successful citizen participation pilots. 

With campaigning for local elections on hold, traditional, in-person forms of political participation are currently impossible. CitizenLab’s technology allows people to make their voices heard in a safe and efficient way. The platform provides Governments, Local Authorities, and membership organisations with a ‘digital democracy toolbox’. The platform enables them to replace community meetings with virtual discussion forums, organise votes on suggested policy changes, or gather new ideas through surveying tools. 

The technology has already been piloted successfully by the London Borough of Newham. Using digital engagement tools, CitizenLab was able to provide an online portal where people who live, work, and visit Newham could participate actively in the decision making processes, which continued throughout the pandemic uninterrupted. Newham were able to gather hundreds of community views on a number of urban regeneration decisions across a four month period. 

The CitizenLab platform was founded by three Belgian millennials (Wietse Van Ransbeeck, Aline Muylaert, and Koen Gremmelprez), who discovered that, after leaving university and moving into new neighbourhoods, there were very few ways to get involved in community-related issues and local politics. They also found, despite 55% of citizens saying they would like to be involved in local decision-making, 83% say there is a lack of transparency in politics preventing them from doing so. Founded in Brussels 2015, the growing CitizenLab team comprises over 35 people based throughout Europe and the UK, and is a mix of developers and citizen participation experts.

CitizenLab_founders (1).jpg

CitizenLab’s technology has also been designed to drive up engagement amongst young people, who are statistically the least likely to get involved in local politics. A recent study from the University of Cambridge found that in almost every global region, it is among 18-34 year olds that satisfaction with democracy is in significant decline, with less than 50% of under 35s feeling confident in the current democratic system.

Speaking on the importance of trust within political engagement and the need for a continuation of democracy during this unprecedented time, Wietse Van Ransbeeck, CitizenLab Co-founder said:

As millennials, we felt frustrated that there was, and still is, a communication and participation gap between citizens and their decision makers. The pandemic and recent political events within the UK and Europe has meant that this divide has never felt bigger. It’s vital that we find solutions before trust is eroded permanently.

“Our platform has been designed to not only engage with people in a more efficient and effective way, but also to allow citizens and communities to continue to be heard, and collect relevant data about citizens’ priorities. We believe that empowering citizens can help governments make better decisions, improve trust and strengthen democracy.

HUMANITY ON SCREEN

By Grace Thompson

In the past few weeks, we have seen our political leaders on television more than ever before. Regular press briefings, updates to the House of Commons and more breakfast appearances and interviews than the biggest political junkie could wish for.

Even scientists have not been spared the media scrutiny of their personality antics. They have also been thrown into the public gaze in a way that is probably unusual and perhaps even uncomfortable for them. In past years, the face of the Chief Medical Officer may never have been known to the public. This year, we can all recognise him just by sight. The chirpiness of Sir Simon Stevens, the eloquence of Patrick Vallance the honest emotion of Jonathan Van-Tam are all now familiar traits.

Perhaps in a time where we have fewer interactions with our support networks and other people in general, it is somehow comforting to relate, in some way, to the frequent personalities on our screens, even if those methods of relating aren’t always positive! Just as our closest friends and family members get on our nerves from time to time, so we have our favourite political and authority figures who we admire or the ones we may even love to laugh at. 

Surely there is no coincidence that in a year that has caused political advisers and super-forecasters to catch the attention of the media like never before, we have also seen the return of the iconic Spitting Image show, gobbling up new material in their hands with greed. 

In what now seems like an age ago, Theresa May defied past prime ministerial trends by pushing away the show glitzy, cozy-up-to-me PM style of Cameron and Blair. The limelight wasn’t natural to her, so heading up the history-making negotiations of a country leaving the European Union probably wasn’t the best match. Boris Johnson, on the other hand, loves the limelight but probably didn’t bargain for having quite as much airtime as he has had to experience in the past few months, and with very little good news to deliver. 

Trust in our leaders currently requires frequent interaction, even if only virtual, but it requires even more than that. Research is being carried out as to why it seems that many female leaders of countries experiencing Covid have handled the pandemic particularly well. Fierce critics of Nicola Sturgeon, for example, suddenly see a new side to her and praise her sensible decisions and incisive timing. Jacinda Adern sees New Zealand successfully drop to 0 recorded cases and ‘does a little dance’ in her living room to celebrate.  

I don’t think anyone who heard Matt Hancock’s voice shake as he spoke of losing his step-grandfather to Covid could doubt his determination to fight it. Authority can be better followed when those in authority are also seen to be as human as the rest of us. Our leaders, after all, are not immortals in ivory towers, they are flesh and blood who can be infected with viruses as easily as the next person and who can love and lose as we all do. So perhaps, in a time when the best and worst of our humanity is entangling simultaneously, what we need is to see the authentic human side of our leaders on the screen.


Grace Thompson

Grace Thompson