THE ETHICAL INTERIOR DESIGNER

By Selina Seesunkur

On 1 May 2019, the UK Parliament declared a Climate Change Emergency. This has caused a visible push in the production of more electric vehicles to help reduce CO2 emissions, an increase in the reduction and recycling of plastics, and a call to replace old boilers with more economical and environmentally friendly ones. But what does this mean for interior design?  Is it as easy as replacing a halogen light bulb for an LED, installing solar panels, or sending our old furniture to a recycling centre? Can designers and home owners do more?

A recent paper by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation entitled ‘Completing the Picture’, suggests that changes to the five key areas of cement, aluminium, steel, plastics, and food could eliminate almost half of the remaining emissions from the production of goods, or 9.3 billion tonnes of CO2 by 2050. This would be the equivalent of cutting current emissions from all transport to zero.  Furthermore, they argue that switching to the use of sustainable wood instead of polyethylene, and bamboo instead of steel, are also essential moves to further reduce our carbon footprint.

The Reuse Flat in East London, designed by Arboreal, is a good example of creative recycling as all the materials used were sourced from deconstruction sites. The project was to redesign the kitchen, dining, and living room space. The wall panelling and kitchen cabinets are made from reclaimed wood, with broken bricks, concrete and reclaimed wood used to construct the garden walls. Arboreal state that “22% of their materials from the existing site and a further 57% of materials were from reused sources such as the cotton insulation from jeans deposited in French clothes banks and the reclaimed wood floor produced using beams removed from an agricultural building in Orsova, Romania”.

Hard materials such as bricks, concrete, and wood are not the only items that can be used sustainably. Soft materials often used in fixtures and fittings are also going down this route. The Yorkshire based production company Camira have increased their use of recycled fabric, with their new fabric collection Rivet produced from recycled polyester and coming in 3 colourways. Organoid produces carbon neutral wallpaper, with a signature of press flowers, and all materials being sourced as locally as possible. The Italian company Dani claim that their leather lines now have zero impact, claiming that they have reduced their carbon emissions by 5% and, in order to compensate for any other CO2 produced, are taking part in a reforestation programme.  They also claim their processes are innovative and cleaner.

Consumers can also do their part by shopping responsibly and looking at the products and processes that go into making their furniture. We have seen a big movement towards knowing what is on your plate and how it got there. Equally we have seen clothing production questioned and subsequently sweat shops and child labour exposed. Both these areas have made great changes in the way food and clothing is produced, so why not question “what’s in your home”. How many of you have looked at a paint can and reviewed its content for toxins, and bought a different paint? When is the last time you donated a half used can of paint to Dulux’s Community Repaint, which provides unwanted paint pots to schools, charities and housing associations? According to Community Repaint, 387,000 litres of paint were saved in 2012 with 218,000 litres being redistributed to these institutions. Have you ever questioned how your cabinet was made or switched to shopping at a charity shop or re-use centre?  The possibilities are endless, so it’s up to us all to make a conscious decision to make those small changes and not solely rely on the bigger companies like car manufactures, housing developers or supermarkets making the changes for us.

CORRIDORS OF POWER DESIGN AND THE FUTURE OF HOUSING POLICY

By Charles Leon

When the BIID get the call to join a committee at Houses of Parliament, you go, right? Who wouldn’t? One of England’s most spectacular working buildings that is the hub of power and influence and it’s a chance to get some of our agendas across to people who may be able to make a difference. The building itself is rich with an air of expectation and of purpose. Important stuff goes on here.

Well, that was the call from APDIG (All-Party Design and Innovation Group). To join, as President of the British Institute of Interior Design (BIID), the panel in Committee room 8 to discuss Design and the Future of Housing Policy. APDIG is a forum for open debate between Parliament and the UK’s Design and Innovation communities. The BIID have been involved with this group for a few years and were invited to join the panel with Architects, Planners, Influencers and Politicians.

 The Government has identified a need for an additional 300,000 new homes to be built every year for the next decade to address the current shortage. Design for these homes, often relegated to a minor priority, is one of the central issues and points to the question “what sort of society do we want to build?”. It’s all very well to say we need these many homes built in this much time, but governments must consider the type of communities we want to create. The built environment is one of the most fundamental influences on people’s quality of life and how they interact with each other.


views-of-the-city-947421_1920.jpg

Hosted by Barry Sheerman, MP for Huddersfield and Co-Chair of APDIG, we were joined on the panel by Analie Richards of Mikhail Riches, Chris Hildrey Designer in Residence, Design Museum and Kay Stout of Pollard Thomas Edwards and attend- ed by a host of other architects, designers, developers, contractors, educators, housing trusts financiers, journalists and writers and local authority representatives. A very lively group, all with differing interests in how people live and how we build

The Wellington Room, Committee room 8, just off one of the many corridors, is a large impressive, Pugin room with large portraits looming down from above. The panel sit at the head of a formal horseshoe-shaped table, but Barry Sheerman encourages us to keep the discussion informal and free-flowing. The purpose of this committee is to explore how design can inform housing policy, within the context of community.

Whilst it is obvious that there is insufficient housing stock coming onto the market, this wasn’t identified as the main central issue.

From our point of view, Architects, Designers and Influencers, the current thinking is wrong and short-termist. We should be looking more closely at building environments that contribute to the overall well-being of our communities rather than purely pursuing financial and investment goals. It’s not enough to build 300,000 new homes, they have to be the right homes for the right people in the right stages of their lives.

Housing.jpg

Governmental Housing policy tends to focus on achieving statistical targets, why, because these are easily measurable. But the housing and developments may not be fit for purpose. Building boxes with a one-size-fits-all mentality will not work. A family have different needs from someone coming out of School, College or University and someone thinking of retiring or downsizing will have different and changing needs. It’s not about the numbers, it’s about the quality and appropriateness of the homes.

The environment that homes are built in and their sense of community, is vitally important. There is a need to think holistically and how it interacts with new and existing housing stock and existing communities. Design has a vital role in understanding and interpreting the needs of communities and engagement with the communities to make human and community-centred buildings should be at the top of our priorities.

It’s also a question of courage and trust. Policy makers need to trust the design and architectural communities to find creative solutions to the whole range of housing needs. Rather than encouraging cookie-cutter developments which may superficially be cost effective and deliver the numbers. Policy makers need to look at deeper and more creative solutions. They are out there.

The committee will try to carry forward some of the points raised in the meeting, with a view to preparing a report for Parliament.

Overall though, it seems what is needed is a longer-term vision, one that doesn’t last the length of just one parliament, backed up by a different mind- set, one that isn’t focussed on the numbers but one that is focussed on building more long-term, sustainable environments that are built with the well-being of communities in mind. One that deals with the complex interaction of people, spaces, homes, sociology and living communities. Isn’t that what design is?